Bubble By-law Staff Memo

City Staff have released their Feasibility Assessment on the proposed Bubble By-law for review by council next month. The memo echoes some of our concerns about the by-law, including infringing on Charter rights and opening the city up to legal challenges. It sparked additional concerns for us at Horizon Ottawa and the Defend Dissent Coalition. 

 

The stated intention of the proposed by-law is to “to address harassment and hate speech around vulnerable infrastructure.” The proposal of this by-law as a solution to these problems makes a lot of assumptions and leaves us with many questions. 

Hate crimes

The document cites the OPS, which says the number of hate crimes and demonstrations are going up – but we don’t have data that shows how many of these hate crimes are at all connected to demonstrations. How can they know that hate crimes would decrease if this by-law was implemented? Does the city or OPS have an estimate?

Untested solution

Staff admits that these types of by-laws “are largely untested”. In Vaughan, no charges have been laid using their version of a “bubble by-law” since it came into effect in 2024. How will the city determine the effectiveness of the by-law at achieving its goals?

Existing tools 

Law enforcement already have tools to protect the public through the Criminal Code, Highway Traffic Act, and municipal by-laws (noise, traffic, parking). Staff’s memo says these measures “typically apply after the fact.” Thus, they envision the Bubble By-law as a deterrent to dissuade individuals and groups from organizing demonstrations. But how can the city or law enforcement determine the effectiveness of a deterrent? If people don’t organize due to fear of fines under the by-law, the demonstrations simply won’t occur and there will be no way of tracking this. 

Risk of legal challenges

In Calgary, their by-law is facing two legal challenges. Staff recommended the city wait to see the result of these cases. 

Ottawa’s by-law “could be criticized as an unreasonable infringement on the right to freedom of expression and the right of peaceful assembly guaranteed under … the Charter”. Staff recognize the city must show that the benefits of a vulnerable social infrastructure by-law don’t outweigh the negative impacts. The right to feel comfortable doesn’t come anywhere close to outweighing the right to freedom of expression. The memo includes a recognition that the objective of the by-law needs to be pressing and substantial in order to justify limiting a Charter right – which we argue is not, based on the weak arguments presented. How can the city consider stripping away our rights for unknown benefits?

 

Read the full memo from staff here.

How can we stop the Bubble By-law?

Latest posts

Share this post

Take action

Events
Volunteer Shifts
Become a Member
Donate